WWE Claims May Be Barred By Agreement: Judge

By Ryan Davis (September 17, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Finding that attorneys for World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. have made conflicting claims about a key piece of evidence in two different cases accusing toy maker Jakks Pacific Inc. of bribery and antitrust violations, a federal judge has reconsidered his earlier ruling that WWE's claims were not precluded by an agreement made between the parties before the case was filed....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!