5 Important Insurance Rulings You May Have Missed

By Jeff Sistrunk (November 20, 2015, 2:58 PM EST) -- Highly anticipated insurance rulings in recent months have overshadowed several other notable court decisions, including a Third Circuit opinion axing coverage for suits over Urban Outfitters' collection of customer ZIP codes and a Maryland appeals court's ruling that contractors can seek coverage for more than vicarious liability under subcontractors' policies.

While attorneys were focused on the California Supreme Court's decision to expand companies' ability to assign insurance rights and the Pennsylvania high court's ruling enabling policyholders to settle without their insurers' consent, some other decisions may have flown under their radar.

Here, Law360 recaps the recent insurance rulings you may have...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!