Attorneys React To High Court's Merrill Lynch Ruling

Law360, New York (May 16, 2016, 7:41 PM EDT) -- On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal securities laws don't preempt some claims from being brought in state court, upholding a Third Circuit ruling that sent a suit against a Merrill Lynch unit and other Wall Street firms back to a New Jersey state court. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Merrill Lynch v. Manning is significant.

  Ross A. Albert, Morris Manning & Martin LLP

"As indicated by the 8-0 vote, today's Supreme Court ruling in Merrill Lynch v. Manning was not much of a jurisprudential surprise. Reflecting the near-universal perception that federal courts are a...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!