Spokeo Aftermath: A Look At The 11th Circ. Approach

Law360, New York (August 11, 2016, 11:39 AM EDT) -- When the U.S. Supreme Court issues a ruling, the hope is that it will provide clear guidance on a particular area of law so that lower courts can uniformly apply the law. Unfortunately, from time to time, courts disagree as to the application of Supreme Court jurisprudence. Often, courts struggle with determining whether particular Supreme Court rulings are limited to the facts or intended for broad application. The Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 194 L. Ed. 2d 635 (2016) appears to have sparked such controversy....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!