Availability Rule's Death Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

By Jacob Mihm, Hoke LLC (January 26, 2017, 10:05 AM EST) -- Just last month, the Sixth Circuit delivered the most recent decision to address whether, in a pro rata jurisdiction, the allocation of losses for long-tail claims should be limited to policy periods in which insurance was available for purchase by the policyholder to cover those claims. In Continental Casualty Co. v. Indian Head Industries Inc. (6th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016), the Sixth Circuit confirmed that, under Michigan law, the availability rule applies to pro rata allocation for asbestos claims. Numerous other jurisdictions have adopted the availability rule as well. Thus, rumors of its demise, as suggested in Scott Seaman's recent Law 360 article titled "Door Closing On 'Unavailability' Insurance Exception" (Jan. 9 and 10, 2017), have been greatly exaggerated....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!