Justices Level Class Action Playing Field In Xbox Ruling
By Emily Field (June 12, 2017, 10:23 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's decision that a consumer alleging Microsoft Xbox 360 game consoles are defective can't appeal a class certification order by using a tactic only available to plaintiffs levels the playing field between plaintiffs and defendants for class actions, attorneys say.
The high court's ruling stemmed from a proposed class action filed in 2011 by lead plaintiff Seth Baker, who had claimed that the XBox 360 units scratched game discs. Following the denial of class certification the next year, Baker voluntarily dismissed his individual claims with prejudice and then appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
The Supreme Court's decision, penned...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!