Analysis

Mesh Ruling Signals Tough Road For Non-Pa. Cases In Philly

Law360, Philadelphia (August 9, 2017, 7:08 PM EDT) -- A judge's decision to rethink ​whether out-of-state residents can sue a Johnson & Johnson unit in Philadelphia County over allegedly defective pelvic mesh products, which follows two landmark U.S. Supreme Court rulings on similar jurisdictional questions, could signal a new normal of heightened scrutiny for non-Pennsylvania plaintiffs who have historically flocked to the forum.

Judge Arnold New in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas agreed last Wednesday that new precedent from the Supreme Court required reconsideration of his two-year-old finding that Ethicon Inc. had sufficient ties to Pennsylvania for it to be subject to general jurisdiction in the state in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!