Wells Fargo Derivative Suit A Cautionary Tale For Directors

Law360, New York (December 11, 2017, 10:46 AM EST) -- On Oct. 4, 2017, in In re Wells Fargo & Co. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, which concerns alleged sales practices at Wells Fargo that have received wide attention, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the Northern District of California substantially denied the defendant officers' and directors' motions to dismiss the complaint.[1] Judge Tigar had previously granted in part and denied in part nominal defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss the complaint.[2] Notably, the court's Oct. 4 order took a somewhat broad read of the complaint's allegations concerning the directors' knowledge of the alleged sales practices that support the plaintiffs' Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!