Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-04641
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Boies Schiller
- Bradley Arant
- Butzel Long
- Castillo Snyder
- Clark Hill
- Cowles & Thompson
- Fogler Brar
- Jenner & Block
- McKool Smith
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 17, 2019
Greenberg Traurig Inks $65M Deal To End Stanford Ponzi Suit
Greenberg Traurig has agreed to pay $65 million to clear up claims related to its alleged involvement in a $7 billion scheme run by convicted Ponzi scammer R. Allen Stanford, according to a filing Thursday in Texas federal court.
-
August 22, 2019
Greenberg Traurig Was Key To Stanford Ponzi, Receiver Says
The receiver for convicted Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford's estate told a Texas federal judge Wednesday that despite its claims otherwise, Greenberg Traurig LLP's participation in Stanford's $7 billion scheme was "pervasive and extensive."
-
July 23, 2019
Greenberg Traurig Seeks End To Stanford Ponzi Suit
Greenberg Traurig LLP has moved to nix the remaining claims in a suit alleging that it actively participated in convicted Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford's plan to dupe investors out of billions of dollars.
-
December 05, 2018
Greenberg Traurig Wants Part Of Stanford Ponzi Claim Axed
Greenberg Traurig LLP told a Texas federal judge on Tuesday that recent precedent from the Fifth Circuit dooms a claim that it actively participated in convicted Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford's plan to dupe investors out of billions of dollars.
-
March 27, 2018
Judge OKs Hunton's $34M Settlement With Stanford Investors
A Texas federal judge has signed off on a $34 million settlement, including $8.5 million in attorneys' fees, as part of a deal to settle allegations that Hunton & Williams LLP aided Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, saying that the amounts were reasonable.
-
November 22, 2017
Hunton Moves To Toss $34M Stanford Deal Objections
Hunton & Williams LLP asked a Texas federal judge Tuesday to reject the objections that have been raised to its $34 million deal to settle allegations that it aided Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, saying the settlement is fair and won't impact the rights of other parties embroiled in litigation over the scheme.
-
September 05, 2017
4 Takeaways From Hunton & Williams' $34M Stanford Deal
Hunton & Williams LLP has become the latest law firm to settle allegations that it aided Robert Allen Stanford’s $7 billion Ponzi scheme, inking a $34 million deal that would benefit some of Stanford’s thousands of victims. Here are four takeaways from Hunton’s deal and their potential impact on the case going forward.
-
September 06, 2016
Hunton & Williams Pushes Immunity In Stanford Investor Suit
Hunton & Williams LLP has pushed a Texas federal court to reject arguments by a proposed class of investors defrauded by Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme claiming the firm aided the financial ploy, saying purported "exceptions" to the state's attorney immunity doctrines do not exist.
-
August 08, 2016
Stanford Investors Blast Hunton & Williams' Immunity Bid
A proposed class of investors defrauded by Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme have urged a Texas federal judge to reject a bid by Hunton & Williams LLP to escape claims that it and Greenberg Traurig LLP aided the scheme, saying attorney immunity doesn't apply.
-
July 25, 2016
Greenberg Traurig Claims Immunity In Ponzi Scheme Suit
Greenberg Traurig LLP on Friday continued its fight to quash a proposed investor class action alleging the firm and Hunton & Williams LLP aided Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, telling a federal judge in Texas that attorney immunity bars the claims.