Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:13-cv-20000

Court:

Alabama Northern

Nature of Suit:

890 Other Statutory Actions

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Judge R David Proctor

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. April 16, 2018

    Merger Case Can't Be Used To Rule Anthem Facts Undisputed

    An Alabama federal judge on Monday found that the plaintiffs in an antitrust multidistrict litigation against Blue Cross Blue Shield can't declare facts about Blue Cross subsidiary Anthem undisputed based on the ruling that sunk last year's $54 million Cigna Corp.-Anthem merger.

  2. April 06, 2018

    BCBS Must Face Tough Per Se Test In Antitrust MDL

    An Alabama federal judge decided Thursday that health care providers and subscribers suing Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers need only prove that the insurance plans plotted to divvy up geographic markets to succeed on those claims in antitrust multidistrict litigation, dealing a setback to the network.

  3. December 07, 2017

    BCBS Units Must Produce Additional Docs In Antitrust MDL

    An Alabama federal judge has ordered two Georgia-based Blue Cross Blue Shield units operated by Anthem to produce missing data in multidistrict litigation alleging the health care provider fixed insurance prices, telling the provider that if it does not submit the documents, it must explain why under oath.

  4. April 07, 2017

    BCBS Fires Back At Reconsideration Bid In Antitrust MDL

    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama fought back Thursday after subscribers suing it for price-fixing sought to undo a federal judge's ruling that trimmed their claims against the insurer, saying the subscribers were just rehashing arguments that had already been rejected in the ruling itself. 

  5. March 24, 2017

    Subscribers Want Blue Cross Antitrust MDL Trims Rethought

    Insurance subscribers in multidistrict litigation accusing Blue Cross Blue Shield of a massive price-fixing conspiracy asked an Alabama federal judge to reconsider some of his summary judgment ruling, arguing Thursday that the company's out-of-state plans don't qualify for antitrust immunity.

  6. February 24, 2017

    Claims Slip Through Ala. BCBS Defenses In Antitrust MDL

    An Alabama federal judge on Thursday said Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama was entitled to summary judgment on some claims in multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy among BCBS plans but said it was only partially protected by an antitrust immunity doctrine.

  7. January 05, 2017

    BCBS To Take Dismissal Loss In Antitrust MDL To 11th Circ.

    Five Blue Cross Blue Shield plans that last month lost an attempt to escape multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy on Wednesday asked an Alabama federal court to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Eleventh Circuit to answer questions about jurisdiction.

  8. December 22, 2016

    9 Blue Cross Plans Lose Bids To Escape Antitrust MDL

    An Alabama federal judge on Wednesday smacked down efforts by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to escape multidistrict litigation alleging a vast price-fixing conspiracy, finding that the insurers have sufficient business ties to the geographic area in question.

  9. October 21, 2016

    2 Blue Cross Support Orgs Escape Antitrust MDL

    An Alabama federal judge on Thursday let off the hook two organizations accused in multidistrict litigation of conspiring with Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance plans to fix prices paid to medical providers, saying they were "pawns" of their BCBS owners and were incapable of engaging in the alleged scheme.

  10. August 30, 2016

    Blue Cross Says Damages Are No-Go In Antitrust MDL

    Blue Cross Blue Shield subscribers in Alabama accusing the insurer of anti-competitive behavior cannot recover the damages they seek because decades-old U.S. Supreme Court precedent bars all damages claims related to a rate that has been filed with the government, the insurer said in the multidistrict litigation Monday.