Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States v. Navistar Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-06143
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Babst Calland
- Baker & Hostetler
- DLA Piper
- Haynes & Boone
- Hogan Lovells
- Kelley Drye
- K&L Gates
- Latham & Watkins
- Sidley Austin
- Van Ness Feldman
Companies
- AB Volvo
- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
- Caterpillar Inc.
- Cummins Inc.
- Deere & Co.
- Navistar International Corp.
- PACCAR Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 25, 2021
Navistar Will Pay $52M To Settle EPA Truck Engine Claims
Navistar Inc. on Monday agreed to pay $52 million to settle the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's accusations that the trucking giant violated the Clean Air Act by selling heavy-duty diesel engines without the required certification that they met emissions standards.
-
May 25, 2021
EPA, Navistar Reach Deal In Diesel Emissions Suit Before Trial
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reached a tentative deal to resolve its accusations that trucking giant Navistar Inc. violated the Clean Air Act by selling heavy-duty diesel engines without the required certification that they met emissions standards, they told an Illinois federal judge Tuesday.
-
December 22, 2020
Navistar Can't Duck EPA's Clean Air Act Claims
Because Navistar Inc. reaped economic benefits from Clean Air Act credits for its diesel engines that shouldn't have been granted, it can't avoid the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's attempt to pursue CAA violations over those engines, an Illinois federal judge has ruled.
-
March 09, 2017
Navistar Objects To 2 Orders It Says Stalled Its Defense
Navistar Inc. on Wednesday objected to two Illinois federal magistrate judge orders that it says completely eliminate its ability to seek information supporting its defense against U.S. Environmental Protection Agency claims that it produced diesel engines that weren't Clean Air Act-compliant.
-
March 01, 2017
EPA Gets Partial Win Against Navistar In Clean Air Row
An Illinois federal judge on Wednesday found in favor of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ruling that diesel engines Navistar Inc. sold in 2010 were not covered by its 2009 certificate of conformity, in a possible violation of the Clean Air Act.
-
February 23, 2017
Navistar Can't Get 3rd-Party Docs In EPA Clean Air Row
An Illinois federal judge ruled Wednesday that Navistar Inc. could not get confidential business information from third-party heavy-duty diesel engine manufacturers in its defense against EPA claims that it put diesel engines on the market that were not compliant with the Clean Air Act.
-
December 13, 2016
EPA Says Navistar Wants Old, 'Irrelevant' Docs In CAA Row
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday told an Illinois federal court to refuse Navistar’s request for agency documents more than a decade old in an effort to support its defense against alleged liability for putting diesel engines not compliant with the Clean Air Act into the marketplace.
-
November 28, 2016
Navistar Rivals Allowed Into CAA Suit To Protect Biz Data
An Illinois federal magistrate judge on Monday allowed a group of third-party manufacturers to intervene in the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Act lawsuit against diesel engine maker Navistar Inc. over concerns about the release of their confidential business information during discovery.
-
September 09, 2016
Navistar Says EPA Can't Switch Argument In Engine Suit
Navistar Inc. on Thursday further pressed an Illinois federal judge to ignore arguments brought up by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the agency's bid to penalize the engine maker for alleged air quality compliance failures, saying the agency shouldn't be able to reframe its argument in a reply brief.
-
August 26, 2016
Navistar Calls For Rejection Of 'New' EPA Stance In CAA Fight
Navistar Inc. urged an Illinois federal court on Thursday to ignore arguments made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as to the manufacturer's liability for putting thousands of noncompliant heavy-duty diesel engines into commerce, saying the arguments are "entirely new" and should not be considered.