Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:17-cv-05228

Court:

New York Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision

Judge:

Nicholas G. Garaufis

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. December 10, 2020

    Judge Scolds DHS For 'Inappropriate' DACA Web Notice

    A New York federal judge chastised the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Thursday after people sent him messages criticizing last week's ruling reinstating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, chiding the government for singling him out in a public notice following that decision.

  2. December 04, 2020

    Trump Admin. Must Resume DACA Program, NY Judge Rules

    A New York federal judge ordered the Trump administration to fully reinstate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, ruling Friday that because acting U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Chad Wolf was improperly appointed to his role, he lacked the authority to issue a memo curbing the program.

  3. November 25, 2020

    States, Immigrants Ask NY Judge To Order DACA Resumed

    More than a dozen states and a group of immigrants urged a New York federal judge on Tuesday to order the Trump administration to fully reinstate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and to frequently update the court on its compliance with that order.

  4. November 18, 2020

    NY Judge Slams Feds For 'Ignoring' Justices' DACA Revival

    A New York federal judge rebuked the Trump administration Wednesday for refusing to reinstate DACA, saying the administration was "ignoring" court orders that preserved the immigration program while trying to "run out the clock" on the president's remaining time in office.

  5. November 15, 2020

    DHS Chief's Invalid Appointment Sinks Effort To Curb DACA

    A New York federal judge on Saturday struck down the Trump administration's latest bid to roll back DACA, finding that acting Homeland Security chief Chad Wolf was improperly appointed and lacked the authority to limit the Obama-era immigration program.

  6. March 29, 2018

    DACA Rescission Challenge Allowed To Proceed By NY Judge

    A New York federal judge on Thursday greenlighted a challenge to the Trump administration's decision to roll back the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, finding that so-called Dreamers are likely to succeed in proving that the government was driven by "discriminatory animus."

  7. February 13, 2018

    Trump's DACA Rollback Paused By NY Judge

    A New York federal judge on Tuesday entered an order that temporarily bars the Trump administration from rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, holding that the federal government has not sufficiently justified why it sought to roll back the immigration initiative.

  8. January 17, 2018

    Feds Ask NY Court To Allow DACA Rollback To Continue

    Individuals, organizations and states challenging the Trump administration's move to roll back the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program have failed to establish that the rollback should be temporarily paused by the New York federal court, the federal government has argued.

  9. January 09, 2018

    'Difficult' DACA Cases Head To 2nd Circ.

    A New York federal judge on Monday granted the Trump administration's bid to immediately appeal a November order allowing key procedural and racial-animus allegations to continue in two cases challenging the impending termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, sending the "difficult" cases to the Second Circuit.

  10. November 01, 2017

    States, Advocacy Group Fire Back In DACA Cases

    A group of states, as well as several individuals and a Latino advocacy group, urged a New York federal court Wednesday not to dismiss a pair of high-profile cases challenging the rollback of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, saying the program isn't immune from judicial review.