Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Browning-Ferris, Inc., et al. v. Alban Tractor LLC, et al
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03385
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Winston & Strawn
- Scarinci Hollenbeck
- Stuart D. Kaplow PA
- McGuireWoods
- Morgan Lewis
- McCarter & English
- Squire Patton
- Tydings & Rosenberg
- Bassman Mitchell
- Eckert Seamans
- Law Offices of Joel L. Herz
- Dickinson Wright
- Shapiro Sher
- Orloff Lowenbach
- Lewis Brisbois
- Justis Law Firm
- Merryman Guthrie
- Cole Schotz
- Ice Miller
- Gordon Feinblatt
- Wilson Elser
- Nelson Mullins
- DLA Piper
- Neal Gerber
- Mintz Levin
- Womble Bond
- Blank Rome
- Fisher & Phillips
- Saul Ewing
- Stroock & Stroock
- Kenny Law Group
- Greenbaum Rowe
- Thompson Hammerman
- Stevens & Lee
- Bouland & Brush
- Fedder & Janofsky
- Wagonheim Law
- Niles Barton
- Blades & Rosenfeld
- Pessin Katz
- Clark Hill
- Beveridge & Diamond
- Cermak & Inglin
Companies
- Froehling & Robertson Inc.
- Illinois Sleep Products Inc.
- Carisam-Samuel Meisel Inc.
- Ceres Terminals Inc.
- Kmart Corp.
- Lear Corp.
- Mondelez International Inc.
- Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
- NCR Corp.
- Merck & Co. Inc.
- Applied Industrial Technologies Inc.
- Ally Financial Inc.
- Cowan Systems LLC
- Vornado Realty Trust
- Truist Financial Corp.
- Airgas Inc.
- Genesco Inc.
- Caraustar Industries, Inc.
- Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC
- Legg Mason Inc.
- American Express Co.
- McCormick & Co. Inc.
- Raymond James Financial Inc.
- Tektronix Inc.
- Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
- Penske Automotive Group Inc.
- Unisys Corp.
- PVH Corp.
- Pabst Brewing Co. Inc.
- Shell PLC
- Berwind Corporation
- Crown Central LLC
- NL Industries Inc.
- Wells Fargo & Co.
- Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
- Paramount Global
- Brunswick Corp.
- Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.
- Exxon Mobil Corp.
- Unilever PLC
- Chiquita Brands International Inc.
- HMS Holdings Corp.
- Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
- Quikrete Holdings Inc.
- Pactiv Corp.
- Avis Rent A Car System LLC
- F.N.B. Corp.
- Fuchs Petrolub SE
- Citigroup Inc.
- H&R Block Inc.
- Viad Corp
- Benjamin Moore & Co.
- Greif Inc.
- Long & Foster Cos. Inc.
- 7-Eleven Inc.
- Abacus Corp.
- The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
- KKR & Co. Inc.
- YRC Worldwide Inc.
- Zurich Insurance Group AG
- Givaudan
- HSBC Holdings PLC
- Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
- Graybar Electric Co. Inc.
- Universal Music Group NV
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 18, 2021
Md. Judge Refuses Sanctions In Superfund Cleanup Case
A Maryland federal judge has reminded counsel for both sides to remain civil and professional in her order that denied a sugar company's request to sanction those behind a lawsuit seeking cleanup costs of hazardous substances at Baltimore-area landfills.
-
September 20, 2021
Md. Judge Axes Pabst, Others From $4.8M Superfund Suit
Twenty-six companies have dodged a roughly $4.8 million Superfund suit over cleanup costs of hazardous substances at Baltimore-area landfills after a federal judge found many of the allegations against them were speculative or simply paltry.
-
March 23, 2021
More Companies Want Out Of $4.8M Md. Superfund Suit
A travel restaurant group and other businesses want out of a roughly $4.8 million Superfund suit over cleanup costs of hazardous substances at several Baltimore-area landfills, arguing that the allegations ignore a consent decree that relieved from liability those responsible for small amounts of waste.
-
March 12, 2021
Trucking Co. Wants Out Of $4.8M Superfund Cleanup Suit
A trucking company wants out of a nearly $5 million Superfund cleanup suit claiming it and dozens of other companies were liable for cleanup costs of seven Baltimore landfills containing hazardous substances, arguing the suit didn't show the company was linked to the sites.
-
February 24, 2021
Pabst Wants Out Of $4.8M Baltimore Superfund Cleanup Suit
Pabst Brewing Co. LLC is urging a Maryland federal court to give it a quick exit from a $4.8 million suit alleging it and other brewing companies are responsible for cleanup costs at a Baltimore County superfund site, saying it does not have enough connections to the state for the court to have jurisdiction.