Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
September 21, 2022
Little et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
Case Number:
3:22-cv-01189
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Aylstock Witkin
- Cetrulo LLP
- CMBG3 Law
- DLA Piper
- Fishman Haygood
- Goldberg Segalla
- Holland & Knight
- Levin Sedran
- Pandit Law
- Shook Hardy
- Silver Golub
- Smith Gambrell
- Squitieri & Fearon
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
November 24, 2025
Unilever Class Must Show Standing Before OK Of $3.6M Deal
Unilever and two groups of customers have until Dec. 5 to explain to a Connecticut federal judge whether a proposed $3.6 million settlement defines a class so broad that it could include individuals who lack standing to sue on claims that certain aerosol dry shampoo propellants contained benzene.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login