Class Cert. Evidence Standard Likely Headed To High Court
By Thomas Richie and John Goodman (December 7, 2018, 3:13 PM EST) -- The Ninth Circuit's decision not to grant en banc rehearing in Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center should all but guarantees that the issue of expert testimony at the class certification stage is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sali involved a declaration that was created by a paralegal at one of the firms representing the plaintiffs and then offered to establish typicality under Rule 23(a)(3). The paralegal purported to analyze various time entries, and offered opinion testimony that the named plaintiffs' claims were typical of the class members' claims. Everyone agreed that the declaration was not admissible. The district court kept the spreadsheet out and,...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!