Named Plaintiff In Uber Case Snubs Proposed $100M Deal

Law360, Los Angeles (May 16, 2016, 6:06 PM EDT) -- An Uber driver whose name tops one of two class actions subject to a proposed $100 million settlement over claims Uber drivers were misclassified as independent contractors said Monday he didn't agree to the deal's terms and that the settlement wasn't in the drivers' interest.

Douglas O'Connor, the first plaintiff named in a California lawsuit alleging Uber Technologies Inc. failed to properly compensate its drivers for their expenses and time, said the lead class counsel Shannon Liss-Riordan never went over the terms of the settlement with him and went public with the deal before ever consulting with him, pressuring him to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!