Clearing Up CAFA Post-Removal Amendments At 9th Circ.

By Jaikaran Singh and Andrew Legolvan (June 8, 2017, 11:16 AM EDT) -- In a recent opinion — Broadway Grill Inc. v. Visa Inc., et al., No. 17-15499 — the Ninth Circuit held that a plaintiff may not amend a class action complaint by changing the class definition, after the case has been removed to federal court, to eliminate minimal diversity and defeat federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). The court clarified its holding in Benko v. Quality Loan Service Corp.,[1] where the court allowed a plaintiff to make a post-removal amendment to the complaint to clarify allegations against a defendant regarding whether one of CAFA's jurisdictional exceptions applied....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!