Spokeo Aftermath: A Look At The 11th Circ. Approach

Law360, New York (August 11, 2016, 11:39 AM EDT) -- When the U.S. Supreme Court issues a ruling, the hope is that it will provide clear guidance on a particular area of law so that lower courts can uniformly apply the law. Unfortunately, from time to time, courts disagree as to the application of Supreme Court jurisprudence. Often, courts struggle with determining whether particular Supreme Court rulings are limited to the facts or intended for broad application. The Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 194 L. Ed. 2d 635 (2016) appears to have sparked such controversy.

In Spokeo, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Ninth...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!