Grindr Victory In Fake Profile Case Examined By 2nd Circ.

By Pete Brush (January 7, 2019, 6:10 PM EST) -- The Second Circuit asked Monday if Grindr could be liable for publishing the location of a man whose ex-boyfriend subjected him to a vicious campaign of vengeance after their breakup, but counsel for the gay men's app rejected as "fantastical" the notion that Grindr was anything more than a neutral service.

A three-judge panel took up product liability and negligence claims brought by plaintiff Matthew Herrick after Manhattan U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni dismissed his case last year on the basis that Grindr isn't responsible when others create fake profiles because it is not the publisher of the objectionable content....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!