Ill. Privacy Law Doesn't Flout State Constitution, Judge Says

By Lauraann Wood (August 19, 2020, 7:48 PM EDT) -- An Illinois federal judge on Wednesday rejected several arguments that a fingerprint database manager lobbed in its bid to escape a former indoor trampoline park worker's scanning privacy suit, including the company's claim that the law governing biometrics violate the state's constitution. 

U.S. District Judge Mark Beatty said Pathfinder Software LLC was "a bit hyperbolic" to argue the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act's exemption for "nearly the entire financial industry" made it special legislation that flouted the state constitution.

BIPA's exemption for financial institutions applies only to those that are already subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which imposes its own requirements...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!