Class Action Attys React To High Court's Arbitration Ruling

Law360, New York (June 10, 2013, 10:57 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that courts can't second-guess an arbitrator's interpretation of a contract, backing an arbitrator's ruling that a doctor's pursuit of class arbitration against insurer Oxford Health Plans LLC was permitted under the language of a reimbursement agreement. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the unanimous ruling is significant.

D. Matthew Allen, Carlton Fields

"The decision expands the scope of class actions in arbitration. In Stolt-Nielsen [SA v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.], the court had ruled that an arbitrator may not order a class arbitration when the parties' contract is silent on the point. Here, the contract seemed to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!