9th Circ. Grapples With Escobar Test For FCA Liability

Law360, New York (December 6, 2017, 9:59 PM EST) -- The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday struggled with whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s milestone Escobar decision created an ironclad test for False Claims Act liability, with judges repeatedly expressing uncertainty about the high-stakes question.

At eagerly awaited oral arguments, a three-judge panel examined a whistleblower suit accusing the California-based Academy of Art University of committing fraud by paying banned bonuses to student recruiters. The suit relies on an “implied certification” theory of FCA liability, with the AAU accused of implicitly certifying ongoing compliance with the bonus ban...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

US ex rel. Scott Rose, et al v. Stephens Institute


Case Number

17-15111

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

January 20, 2017

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.