A Confusing Split Over 'Reasonable Consumer' In Fla. Courts

By Aaron Weiss and James Czodli (June 28, 2021, 4:42 PM EDT) -- At least since 1903 — when Judge Richard Collins, acting as Master of the Rolls in the English Court of Appeal libel case decision of McQuire v. Western Morning News Co., discussed the "reasonable man" standard as the perspective of "the man on the Clapham omnibus"[1] — lawyers and judges throughout countries with common law traditions have wrestled with this standard.[2]

In this column, we look at different issues under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, or FDUTPA, and particularly highlight areas in which courts are split. One place where decisions diverge is on the question of who decides...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!