Starbucks Can Use Agency Finding To Defend Prop 65 Suit

Law360, Los Angeles (July 15, 2020, 10:26 PM EDT) -- Starbucks, Dunkin', and other coffee purveyors can use a California regulator's recent finding that chemicals in coffee don't pose a significant cancer risk to defend against allegations they violated the state's Proposition 65 cancer warning requirement, a California judge said Wednesday.

Wearing a face shield in his downtown Los Angeles courtroom and speaking to attorneys by phone, Superior Court Judge Elihu M. Berle denied three motions for summary adjudication brought by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics, saying Starbucks Corp., Dunkin' Brands Inc. and dozens of other coffee roasters had raised triable issues with their affirmative defense piggybacking off...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!