4th Circ. Says Appeal Of E-Cig Compliance Deadline Is Moot

By Sarah Jarvis
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our daily newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the daily Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Health newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!

Law360 (May 4, 2020, 8:48 PM EDT) -- The Fourth Circuit on Monday dismissed an appeal from various vaping groups challenging a compliance deadline for e-cigarettes, saying January directives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have rendered the appeal moot.

In a per curiam opinion, the appellate judges held that guidance issued by the FDA in January moots the vape groups' appeal because that guidance supersedes older directives from August 2017 at issue in the appeal and leaves "no possible meaningful relief" that the court could grant.

"Any ruling by this court as to the procedural or substantive reasonableness of the August 2017 guidance would amount to nothing more than an advisory opinion," the court said.

The appeal stems from a Maryland district court ruling that ordered the agency to set a May 2020 deadline for so-called premarket tobacco product applications, or PMTAs, on smokeless tobacco products. The FDA, along with various health and anti-vaping groups, had argued that the January guidance restricting the sale of flavored, cartridge-based vapes rendered moot the vape groups' appeal.

"Because the enforcement timetable for e-cigarettes set out in the January 2020 guidance is independent of the district court's order, an order by this court reversing the district court would have no effect on FDA's enforcement of the statute and regulations against e-cigarette manufacturers," the agency had previously said.

But the vape groups disagreed, saying the January guidance was enacted without proper notice-and-comment procedures, according to the opinion.

While the court said it can't offer the vape groups relief in this case, the panel added in a footnote that the groups can challenge the January guidance in a separate action in federal court. The panel also ruled that a Maryland district court did not abuse its discretion in denying cigar industry groups' motion to intervene, saying those groups did not intervene in a timely manner.

An FDA spokesperson said Tuesday that the agency affirms its commitment to the extended PMTA deadline of Sept. 9, 2020. The agency said it encourages applicants who are able to submit their applications to do so as soon as possible , adding that sharing information about the number and nature of applications being developed will help the FDA prepare more efficiently for an influx of applications.

Counsel for the cigar and vape groups did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.

Last month, a Maryland federal judge said that in light of the coronavirus pandemic, he would grant a 120-day extension to the May 12 deadline for e-cigarette PMTAs, which have proceeded slowly since the FDA first determined vapes should be regulated like tobacco products.

The FDA had previously asked the Fourth Circuit for approval for the lower court to extend the May deadline, saying it would not affect the merits of the appeal brought by the industry groups. The FDA said many of the laboratories and research organizations conducting the clinical trials for the regulatory applications have shut down or otherwise halted in-person testing in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Public health groups previously sought to accelerate the FDA's regulation of vaping products under the Tobacco Control Act, citing vaping-related lung injuries that sickened thousands of people and left nearly 70 dead in 2019. In July 2019, a Maryland district judge effectively allowed the FDA to set the May 2020 deadline, prompting the vape groups to claim the decision was an arbitrary overextension of both the FDA and the court's authority.

The vape groups had also argued that the May deadline left too little time for manufacturers to file complete applications. Cigar industry groups that filed joint briefs on appeal argued that the district court's order on deadlines unfairly ensnared cigar and pipe tobacco manufacturers as well.

U.S. Circuit Judges G. Steven Agee, Stephanie D. Thacker and Allison Jones Rushing sat on the panel.

The vaping groups are represented by Eric P. Gotting of Keller & Heckman LLP.

The cigar groups are represented by Brian T. Burgess, Benjamin T. Hayes, Andrew Kim and Mark S. Raffman of Goodwin Procter LLP and Michael J. Edney of Steptoe & Johnson LLP.

The government is represented by Joshua Revesz, Mark B. Stern and Lindsey Powell of the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Division, Robert P. Charrow of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and Stacy Cline Amin, Annamarie Kempic, Wendy S. Vicente and Peter G. Dickos of the FDA.

The case is Cigar Association of America v. FDA, case number 19-2130, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

--Additional reporting by Emily Field and Jack Queen. Editing by John Campbell.

Update: This story has been updated to include comment from the FDA.

For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.

View comments

Attached Documents

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

American Academy of Pediatrics et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al

Case Number




Nature of Suit

Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision


Paul W. Grimm

Date Filed

March 27, 2018

Case Title

In re: Cigar Association

Case Number



Appellate - 4th Circuit

Nature of Suit

2899 Other Statutes

Date Filed

October 16, 2019

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!