Tech Co. Won't Get Costs Following Arbitrator DQ Bid

Law360 (May 21, 2020, 10:32 PM EDT) -- A London judge refused on Thursday to order an arbitrator and a nonprofit children's organization to pay costs incurred by an app developer during its bid to remove the arbitrator — who later resigned — saying the app developer couldn't be considered the successful party.

Judge Andrew Henshaw concluded that it wasn't the challenge lodged before him by the app developer, identified in the judgment only as C Ltd., that had led to the arbitrator, identified only as "X," to resign from the proceeding. As such, the developer hadn't succeeded in its court challenge and therefore was not eligible to recoup the costs incurred during the challenge....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!