A Proposed Alternative To PTAB Discretionary Denial Factors

Law360 (October 1, 2020, 6:24 PM EDT) -- We propose replacing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's current NHK-Fintiv factors, derived from the precedential decisions NHK Spring Co. v. Intri-Plex Technologies Inc. and Apple Inc. v. Fintiv Inc., with the alternative "Babcock-Train factors" set forth herein.[1]

These alternative factors have been crafted in an effort to provide clearer institution guidance to the PTAB's administrative patent judges and to afford a neutral perspective with respect to both the particular posture of the party in the PTAB proceeding — petitioner or patent owner — and the specific venue of the parallel district court litigation.

To be clear, we do not suggest that...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!