Senator Off The Hook In Pa. Gerrymandering Case: 3rd Circ.
Law360 (April 24, 2019, 6:41 PM EDT) -- Pennsylvania's top state senator doesn't have to personally pay $30,000 for "improperly" removing a landmark gerrymandering case to federal court because he was acting in his official capacity at the time, the Third Circuit said Wednesday, reversing a lower court's decision.
In a 20-page precedential order, a three-judge panel said that while it agreed with the district court that Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati "lacked an objectively reasonable basis" for removing the hotly contested case in 2017, he nonetheless can't be held personally liable for the decision.
"Recognizing the Supreme Court's directive that courts carefully adhere to the distinction...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.