Pa. Mesh Cases Won't Be Stayed For Jurisdiction Appeals

Law360, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (April 21, 2017, 2:39 PM EDT) -- A Pennsylvania state judge has rejected a bid by Boston Scientific Corp. and a Johnson & Johnson unit to use two pending U.S. Supreme Court appeals over jurisdictional issues to stay more than a hundred cases from out-of-state plaintiffs over injuries caused by allegedly defective pelvic mesh products.

Judge Arnold New in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas issued an order on Tuesday rejecting arguments from BSC and Ethicon Inc. that the pending appeals, which center around personal jurisdiction over claims from out-of-state plaintiffs, could force the mesh cases out of Pennsylvania.

Judge New did not comment on the motions in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!