Hacking Conviction Survives Bad Jury Instructions: Justices

Law360, New York (January 25, 2016, 10:27 AM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court held Monday that a shipping executive sentenced to five years in prison for hacking his former employer can't parlay erroneous jury instructions into an acquittal, rejecting his claim that those instructions meant the federal government had to meet a higher burden of proof than required by law.

The justices' opinion holds that the shipping executive has to be held accountable to the letter of the law, not faulty jury instructions. (Credit: Law360) In a unanimous decision, the high court rejected former Exel Transportation Services Inc. CEO Michael Musacchio's claim that prosecutors had to abide by the incorrect...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!