We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Deciphering RJR Nabisco's 'Domestic Injury' Requirement

Law360, New York (January 5, 2017, 12:47 PM EST) -- Robert P. Reznick

David M. Goldstein

Logan Quinn Dwyer Last June, in RJR Nabisco v. European Union,[1] a deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court resolved a three-way split among the federal courts to define the extraterritorial reach of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The court held that extraterritorial conduct generally can be prosecuted by the government as a criminal or civil RICO violation to the same extent as the underlying violations of law that form the requisite “pattern of racketeering activity.” But the court, erecting...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.