We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close


How Supreme Court Conservatives Have Shaped The FCA

Law360 (May 17, 2019, 5:38 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court’s latest False Claims Act ruling didn’t just decide how much time whistleblowers have to launch fraud cases — it added to a long line of FCA opinions written by right-leaning justices, who have authored virtually all of the high court’s modern FCA precedent.

The May 13 ruling on the FCA’s statute of limitations was penned by Justice Clarence Thomas, who has written at least six FCA opinions since the late 1990s. Other conservative justices have written almost all of the additional opinions focused on FCA interpretation during the law’s modern history, which dates to 1986.

It’s not clear...
Try Law360 FREE for seven days, take a free trial now.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.



Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only


Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

September 11, 2018

Law Firms


Government Agencies