Wadler V. Bio-Rad Poses Noteworthy Whistleblower Questions
By Steve Pearlman and Pinny Goldberg ( March 8, 2019, 1:28 PM EST) -- In Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories[1] — a closely watched case — the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed most of an $11 million jury verdict in favor of a former general counsel in a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit invoking Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,[2] Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act[3] and California common law (aka a Tameny claim).[4]...
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.