Justices' Asbestos Decision Poses Fair Notice Problem

By Mitchell Morris (April 25, 2019, 2:41 PM EDT) -- What is the purpose of a "duty" announced a half-century after it was allegedly breached? A cynical observer — and at least three U.S. Supreme Court justices — might say, at least as to those parties whose alleged breaches occurred many years earlier, that it is less a duty of care, and more a duty to "pay."[1]

Nevertheless, those are the circumstances of the most recent tort duty announced by a majority of the Supreme Court in Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries. The case involved two former U.S. Navy sailors who were allegedly exposed to asbestos on Navy ships...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!