Using Missing Facts As A Defense In NYC Asbestos Suits

Law360 (January 6, 2020, 6:02 PM EST) -- In a personal injury lawsuit, it is reasonable to expect that a plaintiff’s theory of liability against a defendant be supported by facts. If a plaintiff is unable to present any facts to support his theory, investigating the claim becomes impossible. This is because without underlying material facts, the plaintiff’s theory does not have any substance.

In recent cases such as Cosgriff [1], the New York City Asbestos Litigation court has adopted the legal standard that if a defendant can show that the evidentiary record cannot support an inference of exposure to asbestos, it will be entitled to summary judgment. The...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS