'Absurd' Time-Bar Claim Can't Kill Card Shuffler Antitrust Suit

By Anne Cullen (March 23, 2020, 5:01 PM EDT) -- An Illinois federal judge has rejected Scientific Games Corp.'s argument that a competitor's $100 million antitrust case was filed too late, finding that it would be "absurd" to start the clock on the rival's window for bringing suit before that company knew it had been harmed.

"Despite defendants' argument, the law does not mandate the absurd result in which plaintiffs' injury occurred before they even knew their adversary had violated the antitrust laws," U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey ruled Friday in a decision allowing claims from card shuffler maker Taiwan Fulgent Enterprise Co. Ltd. to move forward.

Taiwan Fulgent sued...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!