NCAA Publicity Rule Raises Labor, Antitrust, Policy Issues

By Deborah Gubernick and Michelle Emeterio (September 9, 2020, 3:03 PM EDT) -- Issues surrounding the right to commercialize one's name, image and likeness are nothing new. Indeed, the proverbial ball was set in motion in 1953 when Haelan Laboratories Inc. sued Topps Chewing Gum Inc. for inducing players to enter into contracts allowing Topps to use the players' photographs.[1]

Since then, public policy and additional considerations have created a groundswell for change. The countless lawsuits and apparent imbalance in corporations and universities making millions off the backs of student-athletes created a movement of sorts which ultimately became too strong to ignore.

California kicked things off with legislative changes. In 2019, the state enacted...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!