Zoom Damages Ruling Benefits Securities Defendants

By Jared Gerber and Eduardo Amorim (April 23, 2021, 1:45 PM EDT) -- The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied a motion to reconsider its lead plaintiff selection in In re: Zoom Securities Litigation, adhering to its decision that the 90-day bounce-back provision in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which limits damages based on share price recovery following the revelation of the alleged fraud, can be calculated based on an initial corrective disclosure in a case alleging multiple corrective disclosures....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!