Supreme Court Urged To Revisit Libel 'Malice' In ESPN Row
By Max Jaeger (May 16, 2022, 6:11 PM EDT) -- A Michigan appellate judge implored the U.S. Supreme Court to untangle the "morass" of defamation law and rein in the "ever-expanding" and "nearly insurmountable" actual malice test, as the court revived a gymnastics coach's libel suit against ESPN.
Judge Mark T. Boonstra made the appeal in an opinion Thursday concurring with colleagues that former Central Michigan University women's gymnastics coach Jerry Reighard had raised triable issues about ESPN reporter Daniel Murphy's tweets falsely connecting him to convicted sex offender and former Michigan State University women's gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar.
The First Amendment offered no protection for defamatory speech until a 1964...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!