BIPA Claims Don't Mean Ruinous Damages, Ill. Justices Hear

By Lauraann Wood (May 17, 2022, 10:19 PM EDT) -- The specter of astronomical damages isn't reason to artificially limit how claims accrue under Illinois' biometric privacy statute, a White Castle worker told the state's Supreme Court during oral argument Tuesday, arguing that damages could be calculated more reasonably.

Latrina Cothron, who claims the chain violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act with its fingerprint scans of workers, wants the court to rule that a claim under BIPA accrued with each scan or improper disclosure of her data. White Castle wants the court to determine a BIPA violation accrues only at the first alleged violation, and, backed by a number of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!