Instagram Policy Ruling Shows How To Avoid Privacy Suits

Law360, New York (March 12, 2014, 8:27 PM EDT) -- A California judge recently rejected a proposed class action challenging contractual changes Instagram LLC made to the way it handles user information, a ruling that shows companies can insulate themselves from privacy suits by properly informing users of policy revisions and allowing them to opt out.

In a Feb. 28 order sustaining Instagram's demurrer without leave to amend, Superior Court Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow shut down plaintiff Lucy Rodriguez' putative class action alleging that Instagram breached its contract with users and violated California's unfair competition law by rolling out terms of use changes in December 2012 that, among other things, granted...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!