Calif. Top Court To Give Needed Clarity On Suitable Seating

Law360, New York (March 13, 2014, 7:38 PM EDT) -- The California Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to weigh in on how the state's suitable seating requirements should be interpreted, setting the stage for a ruling that attorneys say will provide welcome clarity to a hazy area of law that has bedeviled retail employers in the Golden State.

The state's highest court agreed to decide questions certified to it by the Ninth Circuit concerning the interpretation of the suitable seating rules in a pair of appeals brought on behalf of CVS cashiers and JPMorgan tellers whose...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Nykeya Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy


Case Number

12-56130

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3790 Other Labor Litigation

Date Filed

June 19, 2012


Case Title

Kemah Henderson, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank


Case Number

13-56095

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3790 Other Labor Litigation

Date Filed

June 21, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.