Calif. Justices Make Deal Unconscionability A Tough Sell

By Erin Coe (August 3, 2015, 11:36 PM EDT) -- The California Supreme Court on Monday found that a car buyer can't avoid an arbitration agreement with a class waiver merely by complaining after the fact that the deal was unfair, a post-Concepcion ruling attorneys say is likely to make it harder for consumers to show an arbitration agreement is unconscionable and that may prove useful to employers in contract fights with workers.

The California Supreme Court reversed a lower appellate court's 2011 finding that car dealer Valencia Holding Co.'s arbitration agreement contained one-sided terms that favored the company to the detriment of the buyer, Gil Sanchez.

The plaintiff, who bought...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!