We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

4 Things To Know About The 'Happy Birthday' Ruling

Law360, New York (September 23, 2015, 8:57 PM EDT) -- Warner/Chappell Music Inc. spent years collecting millions from anyone who wanted to use "Happy Birthday to You," but a federal judge ruled Tuesday that the company never really owned a valid copyright on the century-old song.

While it might come as a surprise to most that anybody claimed to "own" the ubiquitous birthday song, Warner/Chappell had for years been quietly doing just that, raking in an estimated $2 million a year in licensing fees from filmmakers and others.

Warner/Chappell, the publishing unit of Warner Music Group, long claimed that it had inherited a 1935 copyright for the song from a company...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Copyright

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

June 20, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Judge Analytics