Attorneys React To NCAA Student-Athlete Pay Ruling

Law360, New York (September 30, 2015, 8:02 PM EDT) -- The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday struck down the NCAA's ban on paying student-athletes on the grounds that it violates federal antitrust law, but said NCAA athletes did not have to be paid beyond the cost of attending college. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Edward O'Bannon Jr. v. NCAA et al. is significant.

Adam Biegel, Alston & Bird LLP

"The O'Bannon decision is a stark reminder of the power of antitrust law to scrutinize nearly any economic activity to assess its competitive impact. What constitutes 'hard core' antitrust violations is well-known. But the facts-and-circumstances approach applied to all other conduct...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!