Chinese Phone Co. Can't Cite Ericsson Arbitration Loss

Law360, New York (May 27, 2016, 8:37 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge refused Thursday to find that Ericsson Inc. charged a Chinese mobile phone developer an excessive rate for standard-essential patents for wireless technology, saying it would be unfair to apply an arbitration decision issued in a licensing dispute between Ericsson and another company.

U.S. District Judge James V. Selna denied TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.'s motion for partial summary judgment in its lawsuit against Ericsson, saying the jury will play a different role from the arbitration panel and confront a wider range of issues. The judge said the doctrine holding that a decided issue cannot be relitigated is...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!