Attys React To High Court's Auto Service Advisers OT Ruling

Law360, New York (June 20, 2016, 7:09 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Monday in Encino Motorcars v. Navarro vacated a Ninth Circuit ruling that auto service advisers should be eligible to receive overtime compensation, ordering the lower court to reconsider the matter without taking into account Labor Department regulations the justices said were issued without adequate explanation. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision is significant.

Richard Alfred, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

"The Supreme Court unanimously reminded the Department of Labor that it is not Congress. Unlike a legislature, the six-justice majority stated, an administrative agency must give 'adequate' reasons for its decisions. Even when the DOL interprets an ambiguous...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!