9th Circ. Ruling May Stall Uber Driver Classification Suits

Law360, New York (September 9, 2016, 6:02 PM EDT) -- The Ninth Circuit’s ruling that ex-Uber drivers suing the company over background checks must fight it out in individual arbitration, not the courts, deals a body blow to a host of high-profile wage-and-hour class actions where drivers are accusing the ride-hailing giant of misclassifying them as independent contractors, experts say.

The three-judge panel’s much-anticipated Sept. 7 decision largely affirming the validity of Uber Technologies Inc.’s arbitration provisions applies to just two proposed class actions from ex-drivers who claimed that Uber performed background checks without their authorization....
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al


Case Number

15-16178

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3480 Consumer Credit

Date Filed

June 12, 2015


Case Title

Ronald Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc.


Case Number

15-16181

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3480 Consumer Credit

Date Filed

June 12, 2015


Case Title

Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al


Case Number

15-16250

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3480 Consumer Credit

Date Filed

June 23, 2015

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.