Lack Of Patentability Sinks $8M Judgment, 2nd Circ. Told

By Pete Brush (November 21, 2016, 4:27 PM EST) -- Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP sought Monday to wriggle out of an $8 million malpractice judgment over a client's failed attempt to patent web advertising technology, arguing no damages can flow from an invention that wasn't patentable, but the Second Circuit asked if it could decide such a question on the law.

The dissolved firm and attorneys Frederick D. Bailey, Alan E. Schiavelli and Carl Brundidge urged a three-judge panel to dissolve a 2014 judgment for plaintiff Protostorm LLC related to "Gmail-esque" technology, even though the patentability defense wasn't raised at trial.

U.S. District Judge Pamela Chen approved the judgment...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!