California Omissions Claims: Safety Required?

Law360, New York (February 15, 2017, 10:47 AM EST) -- David Stein

Amanda Karl California has the nation's most powerful consumer protection statutes. During the past decade, however, California's federal courts imposed a major constraint on omission claims brought under those statutes.

Rather than holding that any material omission can violate the statutes, federal courts construed the statutes narrowly, holding that they bar only those omissions that involve personal safety. This interpretation has never been grounded in the statutes' text, but has led courts to dismiss dozens of consumer class actions at the pleading stage.

The good news for consumers is that recent developments suggest this constrictive view of California consumer...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!